From: "Sampo Syreeni" <decoy@iki.fi> > Probably. But once people start thinking about URLs as URNs, and abandon the > effort that has gone to resolving generic URNs as opposed to the ease we can > deal with URLs, I think the URN effort dies a horrible death. I think that > URLs and URNs are two different things, neither of which is becoming > obsolete very soon. On the contrary, people should work to get URN > resolution working. Huh? I thought that URNs were designed to be names and only names. If we attach a global resolution meaning to names then we will have URLs. Me thinks a name should resolve to what it identifies only in the memory of an agent hearing or speaking the name. SethReceived on Monday, 11 June 2001 09:05:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT