W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

Re: rdfms-resource-semantics

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:47:02 -0500
To: Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B7465C4A.D7D5%aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk> wrote:

>>> What are the arguments against removing fragments from RDF?
>> 
>> Backwards compatibility. :-(
> 
> Really? How so?

Err, that thousands of RDF documents refer to URIs with fragment
identifiers. Not to mention the tons of deployed namespaces that use them.

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 11:48:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT