W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

RE: rdfms-resource-semantics

From: dehora <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:29:15 +0100
To: "Lee Jonas" <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>, "'Brian McBride'" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DCEBKOHMHCKKIAAPKLLMCELCCIAA.bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
: Lee:
:
: >>Rather than shoehorn the notion of 'resource' into what the RDF M&S spec
: >>requires as a primary building block, you could turn the problem around and
: >>define RDF M&S in the existing terms of RFC2396. 
:
: Brian:
:
: >What you suggest is a change to the RDF formal model.  I don't think it
: >can be considered just an editorial fix.
: >


Lee, Brian,

You'll find one approach to sub-editing the M&S below:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0117.html>

How far one can do this without altering the meaning and intent of the 
paragraph is a matter of debate. IMO (which is distinct from the O 
of the wg) it's a reasonable approach given the scope of the wg charter. 

regards,
Bill

----
Bill de hOra : InterX : bdehora@interx.com 


Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 10:33:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT