W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2001

RE: What to do about namespace derived URI refs... (long)

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:30:25 +0300
Message-ID: <6D1A8E7871B9D211B3B00008C7490AA50795871B@treis03nok>
To: sean@mysterylights.com, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Cc: Ora.Lassila@nokia.com

Yes, there is definite overlap in my thinking on HRNs and
the tag URI scheme, though I was unnaware of tags until
your reference (so clearly, it must be a logical and obvious
approach ;-)

The key point here is that (a) we use URNs rather than URLs
to identify namespaces and abstract resources, and (b) we
define the necessary mappings between a standardized URN
scheme and the various schema and serialization schemes
that might reify or reference those abstract resources
within a given system (i.e. XML Schema, RDF, etc.).



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Sean B. Palmer [mailto:sean@mysterylights.com]
> Sent: 06 June, 2001 15:33
> To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com; www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Cc: Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
> Subject: Re: What to do about namespace derived URI refs... (long)
> > IMO, what is needed to solve this mess is an explicit and
> > standardized notation for global universal identifiers based
> > on a mechanism such as a URN scheme [...]
> Like a "tag"?
>    http://www.taguri.org/
> Quite a lot of discussion about it when released on uri@w3.org, but I
> don't know what the status is now.
> --
> Kindest Regards,
> Sean B. Palmer
> @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
> :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 09:30:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:36 UTC