- From: Nikita Ogievetsky <nogievet@cogx.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:13:27 -0400
- To: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Aaron Swartz wrote: > Sorry, my colleague informs me that the correct triple > representation is: > > <#Car> a daml:Class . > <#Person> a daml:Class . > [ a daml:Disjoint; daml:first <#Car>; daml:rest (<#Person>) ] . > > So there is no reason to be alarmed, Yes, this makes sense. Thanks, Aaron. But now I am back to my original confusion: <daml:Class rdf:ID="Car"/> <daml:Class rdf:ID="Person"/> <daml:Disjoint rdf:parseType="daml:collection"> <daml:Class rdf:about="#Car"/> <daml:Class rdf:about="#Person"/> </daml:Disjoint> You originally said that "rdf:about" is used here to denote object versus subject. And yet in the triples both <#Car> and <#Person> are subjects. What am I missing? Thanks, --Nikita. ---------------------------------------------- Nikita Ogievetsky, Consultant Cogitech Inc. XSLT and topic maps tutorials. email: nogievet@cogx.com, phone: (917) 406-8734 http://www.cogx.com || Cogito Ergo XML
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 19:18:04 UTC