W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > July 2001

Re: thinking about the formal model for RDF

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:58:04 -0700
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010718115344.03768970@mail.gorge.net>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Cc: Stefan Kokkelink <skokkeli@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>, RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 01:51 PM 7/18/01 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
"the RDF name for a resource is its URI", not "we can't mention resources 
without providing their URI"

What does "mention" mean here? I've been operating under the (naive?) 
delusion that to mention something *is* to name it. Just what form exactly 
does this "mentioning" take?

Pedantically yours,

Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 14:57:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:50 GMT