- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 15:59:19 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Jeremy Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > In many of the cases in rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (specifically 02, 07, > 11, 12, 13, 14) there are resources which have an rdf:ID (or rdf:bagID) > value, but then in the n-triple they are anonymous (e.g. '<Seq > rdf:ID="container">' in test11.rdf, the resource becomes '_:container' > in test11.n3). Yup - these were early ones we did before we had things set up so we could know the URI the test cases would be stored at. These will get tidied up. > > One of the test cases rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test04.n3 gives an > n3 spec rather than n-triples, which makes life harder for me. Perhaps > the others in that directory are also really n3 and don't make a clear > distinction between anonymous and non-anonymous nodes. [I don't know n3, > and I am trusting the Jena n-triple processor to read the files]. Again we'll check that - this was also from the early days of n-triple. The definition of n-triple is being refined - and Jena is not quite up to date - so I'd check with me before going to the list. Brian
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2001 11:02:01 UTC