W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2001


From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:02:37 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I finally took a look at:

>[3] A Proposed Interpretation of RDF Containers -
>     http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/

and think it does a pretty good job of cleaning up the messier container 
issues.  I have come to view the RDFM&S constructs as useful, convenient 
ways to present containers whose contents are presented complely within a 
single document.

A comment, for your consideration, concerning rdf:li as an attribute:

Since you allow (example 3):

       [http://foo, rdf:_1, "1"]
       [http://foo, rdf:_1, "1 again"]

why not just map rdf:li as an attribute to rdf:_1?  Then example 4 would be:

        <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://badExample" rdf:li="a" rdf:_3="b"/>

will generate:

         [http://badExample, rdf:_1, "a"]
         [http://badExample, rdf:_3, "b"]

and doesn't have to be viewed as a "bad example".

Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 13:10:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:34 UTC