- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:02:37 +0000
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I finally took a look at:
>[3] A Proposed Interpretation of RDF Containers -
> http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/
and think it does a pretty good job of cleaning up the messier container
issues. I have come to view the RDFM&S constructs as useful, convenient
ways to present containers whose contents are presented complely within a
single document.
A comment, for your consideration, concerning rdf:li as an attribute:
Since you allow (example 3):
[http://foo, rdf:_1, "1"]
[http://foo, rdf:_1, "1 again"]
why not just map rdf:li as an attribute to rdf:_1? Then example 4 would be:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://badExample" rdf:li="a" rdf:_3="b"/>
will generate:
[http://badExample, rdf:_1, "a"]
[http://badExample, rdf:_3, "b"]
and doesn't have to be viewed as a "bad example".
#g
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 13:10:52 UTC