I finally took a look at: >[3] A Proposed Interpretation of RDF Containers - > http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/ and think it does a pretty good job of cleaning up the messier container issues. I have come to view the RDFM&S constructs as useful, convenient ways to present containers whose contents are presented complely within a single document. A comment, for your consideration, concerning rdf:li as an attribute: Since you allow (example 3): [http://foo, rdf:_1, "1"] [http://foo, rdf:_1, "1 again"] why not just map rdf:li as an attribute to rdf:_1? Then example 4 would be: <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://badExample" rdf:li="a" rdf:_3="b"/> will generate: [http://badExample, rdf:_1, "a"] [http://badExample, rdf:_3, "b"] and doesn't have to be viewed as a "bad example". #gReceived on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 13:10:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT