Re: Proposal: variables, templates, and Stickey Cyber Molecules

Graham Klyne wrote:

> I think it is possible to achieve this effect without requiring an explicit
> indication that the node is a "variable", although I think there is a need
> to indicate the scope withi which the value/name bindings associated with a
> node may be applicable.

Well maybe its not even a variable;  but the fact that the node is an :Unknown must
be explicitly asserted.   Let's factor all the particulars out of the equation and
see what's left:

:Seth :isLookingFor [ a :Unknown].

That is the intent of the message,  I won't let you just lop it off.

:Seth  :mustGoTo  :Work