W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2001

RE: Container Resources and Reified statement - which is the corr ect parser out there?

From: Ayalew Kassahun <A.Kassahun@InfoRay.NL>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:18:38 +0100
Message-ID: <7FAFD1931B62D411B2890050BAB19FB1337C00@ms1.inforay.nl>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Ok, redland with repat ...

question 2 is answered to me but 1 no yet?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 3:41 PM
> To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Cc: Ayalew Kassahun
> Subject: Re: Container Resources and Reified statement - which is the
> correct parser out there? 
> 
> 
> >>>Ayalew Kassahun said:
> 
> > 1 - I do not understand why Redland 'reifies' statement 
> with ID 'res1'?!
> > 2 - I do not understand why Redland and CARA 'reify' 
> statement stat3. This
> > seems to me wrong.?! 
> 
> Redland is not a parser; it has them (SiRPAC-w3c, SiRPAC-stanford,
> Repat, libwww).  So these statements are incomplete; "Redland with
> parser X ..." would have a meaning.
> 
> Dave
> 
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2001 10:06:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT