W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2001

Re: Container Resources and Reified statement - which is the correct parser out there?

From: Stefan Kokkelink <skokkeli@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:54:41 +0100
Message-ID: <3A5CA1E1.3C4B14F5@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
To: Ayalew Kassahun <A.Kassahun@InfoRay.NL>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Ayalew Kassahun wrote:
...
> 2 - I do not understand why Redland and CARA 'reify' statement stat3.
> This seems to me wrong.?!

I am not sure I understand the problem. Do you ask why

<rdf:Description rdf:ID="res3">
 <prop3 rdf:ID="stat3">another value</prop3>
</rdf:Description>

maps to

 (res3, http://myNS.org#prop3, "another value")
 (stat3, http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type,
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Statement)
 (stat3 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#subject,online:#res3)
 (stat3,
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#predicate,http://myNS.org#prop3)
 (stat3, http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object,"another
value")

?

That is because every ID attribute of a property
results in a reified  statement.

all the best,

stefan
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2001 12:55:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT