W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2001

RE: RDF Terminologicus

From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 10:41:07 +0000
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010105104042.028ebeb0@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF-IG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

At 09:05 PM 1/4/01 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote:
>I suggest that this is currently an unresolved issue.  Its great
>to have a glossary, but it should remain neutral on topics that
>are not resolved.

Agreed.  Or even highlight such issues?


------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)

Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 07:04:31 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: McBride, Brian: "RE: RDF Terminologicus"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "RDF terminology"
Maybe in reply to: Bill dehOra: "RE: RDF Terminologicus"
Next in thread: McBride, Brian: "RE: RDF Terminologicus"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT