W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2001

RE: RDF Terminologicus

From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 20:31:58 +0000
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010104203054.03597600@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF-IG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Brian,

My objection still stands, unless someone can convince me that there really 
_should_ be a one-and-only reification for any statement.

#g
--

At 06:27 PM 1/4/01 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote:
> >
> > "reified statement" seems to be common parlance.
>
> From the formal model of m&s:
>
>   The resource r in the definition above is called the reified
>   statement.
>
>Brian

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 16:23:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT