W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2001

Re: RDF Terminologicus

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:37:49 -0000
Message-ID: <02c901c07687$1d55d200$8849893e@dehora>
To: "RDF-IG" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>
> >"reified statement" seems to be common parlance.
>
> But do we all mean the same thing by it?  ;-)

No, but it'll be used irregardless of what it means, so one might as
well
monopolise the meaning :)
>>

Brian Mc Bride has gracefully pointed out that the M&S recommendation
has already defined "reified statement". Duh.

So, this weekend, I will be mostly rereading the M&S...

- -Bill
- ---
Bill de hÓra  :  InterX  :  bdehora@interx.com


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0

iQA/AwUBOlTQ+eaWiFwg2CH4EQJhUACg2ywEb6+PiIpXWdyaNTm4d79n+pAAoI4U
VZqueTKA9hFZtEec+5x67Lob
=uWdu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 14:49:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT