- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:37:49 -0000
- To: "RDF-IG" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> > >"reified statement" seems to be common parlance. > > But do we all mean the same thing by it? ;-) No, but it'll be used irregardless of what it means, so one might as well monopolise the meaning :) >> Brian Mc Bride has gracefully pointed out that the M&S recommendation has already defined "reified statement". Duh. So, this weekend, I will be mostly rereading the M&S... - -Bill - --- Bill de hÓra : InterX : bdehora@interx.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0 iQA/AwUBOlTQ+eaWiFwg2CH4EQJhUACg2ywEb6+PiIpXWdyaNTm4d79n+pAAoI4U VZqueTKA9hFZtEec+5x67Lob =uWdu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 14:49:18 UTC