Bill dehOra wrote: > > > If > > [nodeX, propertyY, whatever] and; > > [nodeY, propertyY, whatever] and; > > [nodeX, rdf:type, nodeZ] and; > > [nodeY, rdf:type, nodeZ] and; > > [propertyY, atMostOneEntityValue, "yes"]; > > then > > smush (nodeX, nodeY). > > Isn't 'smushing' just unification hacking; am I missing something? > > -Bill > > ----- > Bill de hÓra : InterX : bdehora@interx.com It appears the intent is to do a semantic merge, which may mean that smushing = smashing = completing. -- Frank V. Castellucci http://corelinux.sourceforge.net OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for LinuxReceived on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 06:04:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT