W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2001

Re: data smushing

From: Frank V. Castellucci <frankc@colconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 06:09:00 -0500
Message-ID: <3A53084C.4CB719E3@colconsulting.com>
To: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
CC: "'Seth Russell'" <seth@robustai.net>, Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>, David Megginson <david@megginson.com>, xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Bill dehOra wrote:
> 
> > If
> >    [nodeX, propertyY, whatever] and;
> >    [nodeY, propertyY, whatever] and;
> >    [nodeX, rdf:type, nodeZ] and;
> >    [nodeY, rdf:type, nodeZ] and;
> >    [propertyY, atMostOneEntityValue, "yes"];
> > then
> >    smush (nodeX, nodeY).
> 
> Isn't 'smushing' just unification hacking; am I missing something?
> 
> -Bill
> 
> -----
> Bill de hÓra  :  InterX  :  bdehora@interx.com

It appears the intent is to do a semantic merge, which may mean that
smushing = smashing = completing.

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 06:04:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT