W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2001

Re: Notes On The F2F

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:07:12 -0800
Message-ID: <006701c0a027$544a5460$b17ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>

> guidelines / advices / practises on creating RDF based syntaxes. Thus,
> such a group could be looking at not only producing alternate syntaxes
> for RDF such as furthering the excellent work done on Notation3, but
> also on guidelines for creating your own, such as Seth likes to do

Well I'm sure that's the way it looks to you all; but it's not my intention
to have my own language.  I sinserly hope that Semenglish will become a
widly used RDF language; even perchance the lingua franca.  I branched from
N3 because of TBL's silence about my concerns; and also because I simply
don't think that the W3C will be willing to be as bold as I am attempting to
be.  I intend to evolve Semenglish to be as close to English as
technologically possible, while still preserving it's parseability by
machines and its translatability back into connical RDF/XML.   Others
contributions, as always, are enthusiastically solicited.  Sean has already
contributed much to this effort .. he asked for the ability to just use the
rdf:label in the verb slot .. he got it, see below.

Seth

language: http://robustai.net/mentography/semenglish.html

ThisMessage fromDictionaries
        http://webns.net/swag/,
        http://webns.net/sem/,
        http://robustai.net/~seth/Dictionary/;
is {Seth (thinks RDF is) Kewl.}.
Received on Monday, 26 February 2001 14:09:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT