It is unclear what an RDF parser is supposed to do when it encounters a property without a namespace attached. In fact the spec says: It is recommended that property names always be qualified with a namespace prefix to unambiguously connect the property definition with the corresponding schema. Now this could be read to mean something else, but it could also be interpreted as stating that non-namespaced properties are legal (but not recommended). Another for the issues list? -- Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| The Info Network <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://theinfo.org> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to beReceived on Wednesday, 21 February 2001 20:21:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:47 GMT