At 08:00 PM 2/14/01 -0600, Aaron Swartz wrote: >Data URIs don't refer to resources -- they simply are the resources that one >would normally expect a URI to refer to. Therefore, I don't think data: URIs >need to be explicitly excluded since they do happen to be resources, just >different than what we'd normally expect. I think it's flawed to say a data: URI *is* the resource. RFC2396 describes a resource as a conceptual mapping from a URI to one or more entities. A data: URI describes and embodies that mapping, and as such it is a self contained description of the resource, but that is not the same as _being_ the resource. #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.orgReceived on Thursday, 15 February 2001 05:11:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:47 GMT