W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2001

Re: what RDF is not (was Re: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) W3C Working Draft published)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 20:46:21 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011220201542.02f89488@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: mmoran@netphysic.com, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 14:39 20/12/2001 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>Subject: Re: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) W3C Working 
>Draft     published
>Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:30:29 +0000
>
>How is your solution any different from the solution to a related problem 
>below?

I don't know.


>As far RDF is concerned both solutions depend on magic.

That puzzles me, as I'm sure I can implement the solution I had in mind, so 
it can't be that magical.

As far as I can figure, Mike is considering building an application using 
RDF.  This is good news, and to the extent that I can, I'd like to 
encourage and support him.

Mike has asked for guidance on a specific *practical* problem, and building 
on suggestions from others, I've suggested two possible solutions, with 
different characteristics.  Both will work, but one may suit his 
circumstances better than the other, which is why I've called out the 
differences.

Peter, if you have a better solution to offer, I'd be happy to hear it.

Brian
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 05:42:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:52 GMT