RE: RDF speficiations (was RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype kno t)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext tarod@softhome.net [mailto:tarod@softhome.net]
> Sent: 05 December, 2001 04:03
> To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: RDF speficiations (was RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype
> knot)
> 
> 
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider writes:
> > > 
> > >    John is 23
> > > 
> > >    I would have
> > > 
> > >    John is age1234
> > >    age1234 type integer
> > >    age1234 value 23
> > >  
> > >    Is that right?
> > 
> > Well this is one way of implementing data types for literals.  I,
> > personally prefer one that does not have this ``triple bloat''.
> > 
> 
>   Could you propose another implementation that not supose 
> breaking the
> Sentence model?

I'd recommend that you use URVs, but then I've been told I
talk funny and wear strange clothes...   ;-)

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 17:51:55 UTC