Re: RDF speficiations (was RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider writes:
> > 
> >    John is 23
> > 
> >    I would have
> > 
> >    John is age1234
> >    age1234 type integer
> >    age1234 value 23
> >  
> >    Is that right?
> 
> Well this is one way of implementing data types for literals.  I,
> personally prefer one that does not have this ``triple bloat''.
> 

  Could you propose another implementation that not supose breaking the
Sentence model?

  Thanks,
        Marc