RE: Addressing the QName to URI Mapping Problem

teful.
> 
> For the momement I have listed this message under 'further 
> discussion' of
> the following issues:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-uri
> -substructure
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-qna
> mes-cant-represent-all-uris
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-qna
> me-uri-mapping

I would also appreciate it being listed under rdfms-qnames-as-attrib-values
as my preferred solution to this general mapping problem strongly pushes
for such support of qnames in resource attribute values to achieve a 
consistency in the serialization model.

Cheers,

Patrick

--
Patrick Stickler                      Phone:  +358 3 356 0209
Senior Research Scientist             Mobile: +358 50 483 9453
Software Technology Laboratory        Fax:    +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center                 Video:  +358 3 356 0209 / 4227
Visiokatu 1, 33720 Tampere, Finland   Email:  patrick.stickler@nokia.com