W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2001

Re: Summary of the QName to URI Mapping Problem

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 21:44:58 -0400
Message-Id: <200108190042.f7J0gQ615358@basto.stsn.com>
Cc: <SCranefield@infoscience.otago.ac.nz>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
To: "Piotr Kaminski" <pkaminsk@home.com>
On Friday, August 17, 2001, at 10:34  AM, Piotr Kaminski wrote:

> But how can you say that it's acceptable to consider different 
> QNames to
> be the same?  If I wanted them to be the same, then I would've 
> picked the
> same URI and local name.  If I didn't do that, what gives you 
> the right to
> merge them?

Well, assuming it's in an RDF document: the RDF spec.

--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Saturday, 18 August 2001 21:45:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:51 GMT