From: "Steven Livingstone" <stv_ca@hotmail.com> > <Gender id="Male"> > <rdfs:label>Male</rdfs:label> > <address>Mr</address> > </Gender> > > <Gender id="Female"> > <rdfs:label>Female</rdfs:label> > <address>Ms</address> > </Gender> > > To me the relationship is implicit in the definition, no "if then" is really > needed. I agree. One can declare the needed relationships between things without recourse to the tricky "if_conditional_ then_action" construct. I mentographed your RDF in the diagram below: http://robustai.net/mentography/Gender.gif ... look ma .. no contradictions :) SethReceived on Sunday, 29 April 2001 13:58:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:49 GMT