<- I said: <- > <- if (X, rdfs:class, Male) then (X, address, "Mr.") <- > <- if (X, rdfs:class, Female) then (X, address, "Ms") <- <- Danny said: <- > Wait though - you've just said it, without using any inference. Ok, it <- might <- > not be in the RDF model as it stands, but those look like reasonable <- > statements to me. <- <- What do you mean "without using any inference". Maybe we differ in our <- definitions, but I consider the above to be inference rules. Yep, probably definitions. If I was to say "2 + 2" I wouldn't be performing any addition, and wouldn't expect you to see "4". No inference has been carried out on "if (X, rdfs:class, Female) then (X, address, "Ms")", though presumably your average inference engine in the street would know what to do.Received on Sunday, 29 April 2001 02:06:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:49 GMT