W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Is this valid use?

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:05:23 -0700
Message-ID: <002401c0cd13$0c299ba0$b17ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "Narahari, Sateesh" <Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Narahari, Sateesh" <Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com>

> I was wondering if we can use RDF to describe the input and output
> parameters of a method.
>
> For example,
>
> <mycompany:MethodInput>
>       <rdf:Bag>
> <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#Item"/>
> <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#Supplier"/>
> <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#ShipTo"/>
> <rdf:li
> resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#DigitalSig"/>
>       </rdf:Bag>
> </mycompany:MethodInput>
>
> <mycompany:MethodOutput>
>       <rdf:Bag>
> <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#OrderNo"/>
>       </rdf:Bag>
> </mycompany:MethodOutput>
>
> The idea here is to define the input parameters and output parameters as a
> resource. One could argue why not use schema to define your types, but I
am
> more interested in machine discoverable semantics.

How does a machine discover the semantics of MethodInput and MethodOutput
without a schema?

Seth
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 19:09:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:49 GMT