W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:05:48 -0500
To: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B7011D3B.95BC%aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net> wrote:

>> Well, unless you can identify something, I don't think you'll be able to
>> talk about it on the Semantic Web. Unless I'm missing it's hard to talk
>> about something that's not identified...
>> 
>> "Yeah, it's purple."
>>     "What is?"
>> "It!"
> 
> They would be anonymous.
> 
>     [;  hasColor Purple]

And thus we have identified it: something colored purple.

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 23:05:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT