- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:55:42 +0100
- To: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- CC: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Joshua et al, Thanks for this contribution. I've added a reference to this thread in the RDF Issues List under: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#faq-html-compliance Brian Joshua Allen wrote: > > Speaking in terms of what could be done today, on existing browsers, I > think the recommendation in the FAQ works fine, and is not *wrong*, > except that the issues with using separate namespaces were not worked > out in the XHTML 1.0 spec. The spec (sec. 3.1.2) clearly points this > out as "work unfinished", and it is hard to imagine a way that the work > could be "finished" without making the example in the RDF FAQ valid. So > I personally would look at this as a spec bug, not a HTML code bug -- > especially when the example in the FAQ works fine on any browser likely > to be in use today.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 11:55:44 UTC