W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:54:32 +0100
Message-ID: <3ADA1898.62C70939@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
CC: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi Aaron,

This has been added to this issues list as:

 
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-boolean-valued-properties

Brian


Aaron Swartz wrote:
> 
> The spec explains how to deal with relationships > 3 (rdf:value) but not
> those < 3 (i.e. two). I'd like to suggest we introduce two new properties:
> 
> rdf:is
> rdf:isNot
> 
> This saves us from having to do something klugey like:
> 
> <http://www.aaronsw.com/> bob:likesChocolate 0 .
> 
> and also allows RDF processors to know that it's part of two-valued logic
> and treat it properly.
> 
> --
> Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|       The Info Network
>   <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |     <http://theinfo.org>
> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2001 17:54:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT