W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:45:42 -0700
Message-ID: <001601c0c06c$e1b65dc0$b17ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>, "RDF-IG" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>

> So everything is a thing?

Every Class is a subClass of that which is named Thing.  

language: Semenglish
Seth
    (wants to discuss) Pentuples;
    (wants to collaborate on) SEM.
Pentuples
    see http://robustai.net/mentography/pentuples.gif ;
    comment "Are not meant as a replacement or extension of RDF";
    comment "Pentuples are a proposal for an internal data structure";
    (internal data structure of) SEM.
SEM
    label "Semantic Memory".
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2001 16:50:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT