Re: SV: abstract model

On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Greg FitzPatrick wrote:

[snip...]

[ grin :]

> PPS. I've no problem with Brian's intuition about "Jan made a statement
> about Dan, but I'm not exactly sure what" - it's a nice idea, but I
> don't think it justifies a "the reification" viewpoint.
> 
> * Can of worms stuff apparently.

I suspect this wormcan stems in part from our need to be clearer about
distinguishing between 'statement' in the sense of state-able thing, and a
statement as a social act with date, time, person etc associated...

Dan