W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2000

Re: aboutEachPrefix: what to do?

From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:45:39 +0100
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000913153949.00b24d40@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>, www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 09:18 AM 9/13/00 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
[...]
> > I think that either:
> > (a) the functionality reasonably exists as part of a tool for gathering 
> RDF
> > statements, or
>
>I'm not sure quite what you mean here. Nor why the contrast with (b).
>
> > (b) can be modelled as an RDF property, rather than as part of the RDF 
> core
> > specification.

The distinction I had in mind was that in case (a), the matching is 
performed externally by some tool and never appears explicitly in an RDF 
model.  Rather, a model just contains statements resulting from application 
of such a tool.  This has the disadvantage that it cannot create 
descriptions applying to changes in (say) a web site after the tool is 
originally run.

I think we're broadly in understanding about case (b).  I do have mild 
reservations about using regexp here;  it feels like mixing up the layers 
(lexical and logical).  But I could probably be persuaded it's the 
only/reasonable way for some applications.

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2000 11:09:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:44 GMT