W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2000

RE: Is "Model" part of the RDF model?

From: Bill dehOra <wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:04:51 +0100
Message-ID: <57C6E3244632D411A2F100508BC8079A1BE746@juno.interxtechnology.com>
To: "'Seth Russell'" <seth@robustai.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Cc: rdf <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sorry, is a kind of

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Seth Russell [mailto:seth@robustai.net]
>Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 4:43 PM
>To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
>Cc: rdf
>Subject: Re: Is "Model" part of the RDF model?
>
>
>Bill dehOra wrote:
>
>> I'd be inclined to agree. My api thinks Model isako 
>Resource, since Models
>> can have URIs (or more likely, URNs) and it may be 
>interesting to have
>> Models containing Models or as objects and subjects of 
>Statements. But Model
>> isako Bag isn't neccessary.
>
>What's "isako" ?
>
>In MyMemory every node has a "context vector" which is used to 
>place it into
>various contexts.   Since the context vector is really just a 
>set, contexts in
>my MyMemory act just like classes.
>
>> My api also thinks Literal isako Resource. Having Literals 
>hanging out there
>> as dark matter doesn't make sense to me.
>
>I used to think just like you, but when it came to 
>implementing I placed all the
>literals in a different structure from the statements ... go figure.
>
>Seth Russell
>
Received on Friday, 20 October 2000 12:07:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:44 GMT