W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2000

RE: about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources

From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:55:48 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F239411@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN'" <pachampi@caramail.com>, "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> I still have some problem with that ID thing.

Me too.  I guess this another one for the issues list if
its not there already.

I didn't pick up anything explicit in trawl through the
archives, though I'm sure there has been previous
discussion.  The closest thing is the "what does
for.bar#x identify".

I'll add it to my working list of issues and pointers.


> What exactly is the point of writing, in a file foo.rdf
>  <rdf:Description ID="bar">
> As I understand it, it "defines" the resource
>  foo.rdf#rdf
> So, why not simply write
>  <rdf:Description about="#bar">
> Again, as I understand it, this is because the fragment 
> id "bar" does not exist in the file foo.rdf,
> so rdf:ID allows to define AND describe it.
> Well, the fragment id "bar" does not exist in foo.rdf. So 
> what ? Most of the time, rdf:ID is used (as far as I know) 
> for classes or properties: resources that are abstract by 
> essence, that can not be retrieved anyway ! Naming them 
> foo.rdf#bar or whatever is nothing but a convention.
> Defining a fragment id allows the URI of the resource to 
> return the description of the resource ; but the 
> description is a PROPERTY of the resource, not the resource 
> itself. The metaporperty rdfs:isDefinedBy is intended for 
> that, and XPointer allows to point to any rdf;Description 
> tag in a more standard way.
>  T(rdfs:isDefinedBy, my_resource, foo.rdf#xpointer(...))
> So, did I miss something about rdf:ID ?
>  Pierre-Antoine
> ______________________________________________________
> Bote aux lettres - Caramail - http://www.caramail.com
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2000 09:56:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:32 UTC