W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2000

Re: Of partial reification

From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:51:49 +0000
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001128195038.00e411e0@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Cc: ML RDF-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>
Seth,

I take your point -- I wasn't saying there's no use, just that I wasn't 
prepared to defend it as a required feature....

#g
--


At 03:05 PM 11/23/00 -0800, Seth Russell wrote:
>Graham Klyne wrote:
>
> > Offhand, I don't see any particular use for partial reification, but...
>
><rai:??
>rdf:about="access://robustai.net/MyMemory/Seth#useForPartialReification"
>         rai:context="access://robustai.net/MyMemory/Seth#RDFreification"
>         rai:source="*"
>         dc:language="EN"
>         xmlns:rai="http://robustai.net/rai/"
> >
>
>Well then how do you propose we refer to all statements that have a particular
>property?
>
>     [S] --rdf:Type-----> [rdf:Statement(s)]
>     [S] --rdf:property--> [SomeResource]
>
>Or all statements that have a particular object?
>
>     [S] --rdf:Type-----> [rdf:Statement(s)]
>     [S] --rdf:object--> [SomeResource, literal, or statement]
>
>Or all statements that have a particular subject?
>
>     [S] --rdf:Type-----> [rdf:Statement(s)]
>     [S] --rdf:subject--> [SomeResource]
>
></rai:??>
>
>Seth Russell

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2000 16:07:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT