RE: A triple is not unique.

> Yes. That has been suggested before.  But that means that you can't
> use reification in the way examplified in RDF M&S.

Just to be clear, can you point out the specific examples in M&S that
don't work with the statements as facts interpretation.

For the record, section 5, the formal model section of M&S states:

  There is a set called Statements, each element of which is a triple
  of the form {pred, sub, obj}

That says that each Statement is a triple of the form (s,p,o).  A 
triple in mathematics is uniquely determined by its three components.
 
> 
> My vote is on allowing identical statements with diffrent identities.
> 

Can you clarify what that sentence means :)  How can two identical things
have different identity?  If they  have different identity, they are not
identical!

> And you can't avoid that with statements distributed over several
> models over the net.

Different representations of statements.  In my world model, statements
are abstract and don't have a location on the net.  Perhaps yours is 
different.

Brian