W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2000

RE: Semantic Web: A Summary, and a Discussion

From: Craig Pugsley <craig.pugsley@mimesweeper.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:33:44 -0000
Message-ID: <06B823D16FE8C14DB1F06CCBE6A6F3D25C3BAB@BELL.mimesweeper.com>
To: "'Sean B. Palmer'" <sean@mysterylights.com>
Cc: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Thanks, this is very useful. We need more people doing things such as
summarising and addressing the very real issues that are appearing as the
scope of the technology we are developing becomes clear. Nice one.

CraigP
Research
Content Technologies



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean B. Palmer [mailto:sean@mysterylights.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 4:23 PM
> To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Cc: www-talk@w3.org; Aaron Swartz; Craig Pugsley; William Loughborough
> Subject: Semantic Web: A Summary, and a Discussion
> 
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> Here is a summary of some of the questions asked:-
> 
> 1. What really *is* the Semantic Web?
> 2. How much of it is related to the history of the WWW?
> 3. How much of it is related to the current WWW?
> 4. Are RDF and XML Schemas good enough as SW technologies?
> 5. How can we possibly get the public to use such a complex system?
> 6. Where should such discussions take place?
> 7. What is the next step?
> 8. What about Semantic Output Technologies?
> 9. When can I build my site as a fully Semantic web?
> 10. What other tehnologies are being developed with the SW in mind?
> 
> That's a lot of questions, none of which are particularly 
> easy to answer.
> Maybe we could start an FAQ, as someone suggested?
> My 2c worth:
> 1. The Semantic Web is a machine processble self describing web of
> extensible dynamic languages. It is logic based, but 
> essentially provides a
> huge database of Semantically marked up information, ready 
> for output (whcih
> should itself be Semantic).
> 2. The SW is very close to the true vision of the WWW: the way the WWW
> should be. If it isn't *we* can and should change the vision 
> and the methods
> involved (Power to the People etc.)
> 3. The SW will evolve from current WWW technologies, but many 
> UI problems
> will result, and need to be solved.
> 4. RDF is a stepping stone for the SW, but personally I don't 
> think it is
> the end. It is not even really the start...
> 5. SW data can be generated fairly easily, so it will be 
> relatively easy to
> create Semantic files, and UI media. That's how the Web was 
> envisaged: no
> one would be looking at the source, it would all be done with 
> tools. Now
> it's time to start...
> 6. Not sure.
> 7. See 8.
> 8. Well, I've offered SDF
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Nov/
0033.html) as
the next logical step in our discusions. Really, I think UI problems in the
SW need to be addressed first of all: how we can use RDF and other SW
technologies on our sites NOW ;-)
9. See above.
10. Does anybody know of a list of resources?

Hope this is all useful, some of it is "IMHO", but I am very glad it is
being discussed more now. The SW always seemed to be "taboo", mainly due to
disinformation and ambiguity.

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
----------------------------------------------------
The Semantic Web: A Resource - http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/swr/
WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/
Mysterylights.com - http://www.mysterylights.com/
----------------------------------------------------
"The Internet; is that thing still around?" - Homer J. Simpson


******************************************************************************************
Baltimore Technologies, the market leader in e-security has acquired 
Content Technologies, the market leader in Content Security.  For more
information visit http://www.mimesweeper.com/ct/default.asp, or 
http://www.baltimore.com/ct/faq.html
******************************************************************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.  
If you have received this e-mail in error, please call +44 (0) 118 930 1300.

MAILsweeper, a MIMEsweeper family product, has scanned this message
for e-mail content security threats. Be sure your organization is free from 
e-mail and web content security threats. For information on policy-based 
content security please visit: http://www.mimesweeper.com

Tel: +44 (0) 118 930 1300		Fax: +44 (0) 118 930 1301
E-mail: info@mimesweeper.com	Support: msw.support@mimesweeper.com
Web: http://www.mimesweeper.com	Web: http://www.baltimore.com

MIMEsweeper: Policy-based Content Security
******************************************************************************************
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 12:36:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:46 GMT