I think Tim underrated his Attempt 2, which is a form of ternary relation as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-199902222 <name xml:lang="fi" rdf:value="Ora Lassila"/> The syntax is pretty darned close to the "bad" XML syntax, but it produces a decent RDF model - the resource has a name arc to an anonymous node; this node has a value arc to the string and to the relevant language. I don't think this "means" that the language is a property of the string; I think it means it's an interpretation property of the resource whose value is the string. The ternary relation example works for me. -- Mark -- Mark Grossman Geocast Network Systems Tel: (650)566-3259 190 Independence Dr. Fax: (650)566-8112 Menlo Park, CA 94025 E-Mail: msg@geocast.comReceived on Wednesday, 10 May 2000 17:43:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:39 GMT