- From: Mark Grossman <msg@geocast.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 14:42:41 -0700
- To: Jan Wielemaker <jan@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- CC: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I think Tim underrated his Attempt 2, which is a form of ternary
relation as described in
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-199902222
<name
xml:lang="fi"
rdf:value="Ora Lassila"/>
The syntax is pretty darned close to the "bad" XML syntax, but it
produces a decent RDF model - the resource has a name arc to an
anonymous node; this node has a value arc to the string and to the
relevant language. I don't think this "means" that the language is a
property of the string; I think it means it's an interpretation property
of the resource whose value is the string. The ternary relation example
works for me.
-- Mark
--
Mark Grossman
Geocast Network Systems Tel: (650)566-3259
190 Independence Dr. Fax: (650)566-8112
Menlo Park, CA 94025 E-Mail: msg@geocast.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2000 17:43:18 UTC