W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2000

RE: CC/PP, RDF and trust issues

From: Bill dehOra <Wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:12:38 +0100
Message-ID: <43C2F98D8414D411865A00508BC22AB9064135@odin.cromwellmedia.co.uk>
To: "'McBride, Brian'" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'Graham Klyne'" <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, CC/PP WG list <w3c-ccpp-wg@w3.org>

:       <ccppX:assurance>Brian Says This</ccppX:assurance>
:           <ccppX:colours>2</ccppX:colours>
:       <ccppX:assurance>Graham Says This</ccppX:assurance>
:           <ccppX:colours>3</ccppX:colours>

:You'd need to figure out which to believe, but that seems doable.
:And this is just representation.  You still have to figure whether
:to  believe the representation.  It would be interesting to know 
:how you are proposing to do that.

Well, the thing is, they are not neccessarily in conflict at all. So, in
computer A, a device that has 2 colors might also have 3 colors (no
conflict). But in computer B, this device can have only one color value

I appreciate this is verging off-topic wrt to the thread, but I think it's
important to point out that we don't get "semantics for free" with RDF
interchange languages. In this case, being able to say anything about
anything isn't exactly a win.

Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2000 08:10:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:29 UTC