- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@paranormal.o.se>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:01:23 +0100
- To: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>, RDF Intrest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Gabe Beged-Dov wrote: > > I mention this because the issue of rdf:ID on propertyElt has come up > in the past including (by its absence) in several of Jonas postings > (eg [1][2]) where he uses a new statementID attribute on propertyElt > to indicate the ID of the reified resource corresponding to the > statement. Unless I'm misunderstanding, this doesn't seem necessary. I missed that part of the formal syntax. None of the examples uses that ID. So now we just nead a literalID? ;) -- / Jonas - http://paranormal.o.se/myself/cv/index.html
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2000 01:58:43 UTC