"Perry A. Caro" wrote: > > Interesting info, thanks. Did you happen to talk > about usages of RDF other than the Semantic Web, > particularly unconnected usages? > Not really. In a talk that short, you need a focal point ("and *this* is why you really need RDF [or something like it]"). Examples from the B2B arena seemed like a natural fit with Java developers. What other examples were you thinking of ? > > The CC specifically identifies RDF syntax as a problem that make it hard > (impossible) to apply XML Schema, and suggests that that should be one of > the first issues to work on. This is consistent with the bulk of > discussions on this forum for the last few months. > There have been discussions. And they've been (somewhat) bulky. My original question may boil down to "what's the process for converting mailing-list ruminations into an actual next version (and is that process under way, and how far along is it, and ....) ?" William GrossoReceived on Wednesday, 8 March 2000 13:24:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:39 GMT