Hello Pierre-Antoine, Your answer confuses me. I agree that DayRange should not be a class, but an instance. Then you state: "declare Range as a subclass of class...". Did you mean 'DayRange' or really 'Range'? In the latter case I don't see what you are driving at. Some RDF would be helpful. In the first case, I would then declare DayRange as an instance of Range and with the property sublcassOf. However, subclassof may only be used on classes, not on instances. So this doesn't result in a solution. Could you clarify a bit (possibly with some RDF)? Thanks, Tom. Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN wrote: > Tom Van Eetvelde wrote: > > > > Hello Brian, > > > > That only solves half the problem as I still cannot state that the subclass DayRange only runs from > > 1 to 31. Try to write it down in RDF, you'll see that it doesn't work. Could this be a flaw in the > > RDF schema? In OO programming, one can make subclasses of a base class and in the subclass restrict > > properties of the base class to certain values. This is exactly what I am trying to do here, but it > > seems that RDF doesn't support this kind of construction. > > It does not seem right to me that DayRange be a subclass of Range : > typically, Range is a class and DayRange is the instance, > but DayRange may ALSO be a class (in which case Range is a metaclass) > > This is absolutely possible in RDF, > you just have to declare that Range is a subclass of class > (and that is IS also a class, as you did - both things are different !) > > Pierre-Antoine > > --- Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur > Whatever is said in Latin sounds important.Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2000 09:23:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:40 GMT