W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > July 2000

RE: xmlns, uri+name pairs or just uris..? Clarification needed.

From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:18:02 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F239321@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN'" <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>, "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, ML RDF-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>

> 
> But the implication here are quite deep :
> that means that any property or class MUST have the form 
> <schema>#<id> ??

Is it true that the two parts MUST be separated by a '#'?

Brian McBride
HPLabs

Received on Friday, 28 July 2000 11:18:10 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gerard Maas: "[Fwd: xmlns, uri+name pairs or just uris..? Clarification needed.]"
Previous message: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN: "Re: xmlns, uri+name pairs or just uris..? Clarification needed."
Maybe in reply to: Jan Grant: "xmlns, uri+name pairs or just uris..? Clarification needed."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:40 GMT