W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2000

RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:11:49 -0600
Message-ID: <3888AF75.6D3434E9@w3.org>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> I believe the answer is to use URN's. I don't believe, however, that
> specific URN namespaces for things like ISBN etc have yet been formally
> defined and/or registered.

There's no reason to indirect via a urn: prefix.
	isbn:nnnn
is perfectly valid URI syntax[1], provides all the necessary
information,
and has been in use since Nov 1991. I hope the folks that acutally
own and operate the ISBN social process endorse this practice soon
and register isbn: with IANA.


I maintain an informal registry
of URI schemes:


isbn: 

     Message-Id: <m0khBzh-00081pC@crane.aa.ox.com>
     To: www-interest@nxoc01.cern.ch
     Subject: references in the web to paper documents.
     Date: Tue, 12 Nov 91 23:14:28 -0500
     From: Edward Vielmetti <emv@ox.com>

     I will be using the format

     <a href=isbn:0-13-484080-1> Carl Malamud's "Stacks" </a>

http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes#isbn

[1]  Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax
(RFC 2396) T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter
August 1998
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt


-- 
Dan Connolly
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 21 January 2000 14:14:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:42 GMT