uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com wrote: > This is very key, because RDF is indeed beautifully simple, and we must be > careful to layer any RDF API carefully so that it doesn't choke off the > simplicity and accessibility. SAX is a good analogy, and I'll be happy to > discuss such standardization here or anywhere. There is a proposal for a low-level SAX interface for RDF that was forwarded to the list in Dec from David Megginson. I don't know whether it meets your criteria for simplicity or beauty. He indicated that the production version of DATAX would use this interface. Here's the reference from the archives: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/1999Dec/0045.html Cordially from Corvallis, Gabe Beged-Dov - http://www.jfinity.com/gabeReceived on Tuesday, 4 January 2000 22:04:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:38 GMT