David Megginson wrote: > > If the implementors don't come up with anything significant, then it's > probably better to throw out RDF altogether and start over. I'm still > tempted to design something RDF-like but much simpler and better > documented, but so far (at the end of 2000-02) I think there's still a > bit of hope for RDF: I'm not willing to split the market as long as > there's a market to split, because the network effect is what we all > really need. David, is what you have in mind better suitable for object serialization? Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Haustein University of Dortmund Computer Science VIII www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.deReceived on Tuesday, 29 February 2000 14:05:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:38 GMT