W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2000

Re: SV: A certain difficulty - lack of action+AC

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 18:38:41 -0500
Message-ID: <38BB0701.A244ED3E@reutershealth.com>
To: Sergey Melnik +ADw-melnik+AEA-db.stanford.edu+AD4
CC: RDF Interest Group +ADw-www-rdf-interest+AEA-w3.org+AD4
Sergey Melnik wrote:

> It does cover the RDF model completely. Section 5 of the spec states
> that clear enough (not that is does not buries it in syntax before and
> after that): http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#model

PCData is insufficient to handle RDF Strings, because a String contains
not only a sequence of characters, but also a language.  So at least you
need some way to model the language of a String.

In addition, there are now three kinds of objects (in the sense "object
of a sentence"), Strings, resources, and uninterpreted WF XML.  Your serialization
gives no way to specify the third case.


Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Monday, 28 February 2000 18:38:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:29 UTC