W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2000

Re: A certain difficulty

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:42:35 -0500
Message-ID: <017501bf7f20$d4168570$a60a1712@col.w3.org>
To: "Ray Fergerson" <fergerson@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: "Greg FitzPatrick" <gf@medianet.org>, <xml-dev@xml.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Fergerson <fergerson@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Cc: Greg FitzPatrick <gf@medianet.org>; xml-dev@xml.org <xml-dev@xml.org>;
www-rdf-interest@w3.org <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: A certain difficulty

>Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
> > >Should Protégé be seen as an instrument of renormalization shedding
> > on
> > >the processes of serializing conceptuality or as the FrontPage of RDF?
> >
> > That all depends on whether it gravitates to a community consensus and a
> > weblike
> > way of working - with community feedback and source code - or whether it
> > an output-only project! ;-)  So far, things are looking good as seen
from a
> > gret distance.
>I'm not sure if the "it" in this sentence refers to Protege or not.  "It"
>seems to.  If so, I'd like to emphasize a couple of points we brought up
>earlier. Protege is already open [...] We actively encourage feedback [..]

I didn't mean to sound pessimistic - far from it! These and the other
reasons you give are among my reasons for saying the situation looks good!
Keep up the good work.

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2000 18:42:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:29 UTC