Re: Towards a final consensus re statements & statings

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com writes:

> 3. Interned notation:
>      [s]p[o]
> 
> It's just an idea, but why not use that interned thing as a
> (Skolem) value for the statement triple identification?
> So one could write things like
>   context-URI#[s]p[[a]b[c]]

There are two problems:
 1. Nobody has to use it since it's not in the M&S.  That means that
we still has multipple resources for the same statement.
 2. The value part can be arbitrary long. Maby several magabytes.
That would be a very long URI.

Digest URIs has been suggested. But that still doesn't solve no 1.


-- 
/ Jonas Liljegren

The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/
Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/

Received on Saturday, 23 December 2000 06:19:30 UTC