W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2000

Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)

From: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 02:28:48 +0100
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
cc: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>, W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>, RDF-Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20001207031523-r01010600-0f5a7e54@10.0.0.2>
On 08.11.00 at 17:22, Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com> wrote:

>William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net> wrote:
>
>> 1) validated its XHTML/CSS components ("generated by tidy",etc.);
>
>Hmm, this would be a good thing for the W3C to pursue. It'd be nice if the
>validator not only provided a Web badge, but also a little snippet of RDF
>to insert to state the document was validated. I'm CC-ing the
>www-validator list, but could responses their please also reply to me,
>because I'm not a subscriber. 
>
>First, however, the W3C would have to define a URI for validation status.
>I'm sure the proper person for that job is somewhere on this list.

Just to make sure this doesn't disappear into a black hole -- I dunno what
discussions took place on rdf-interest (don't read it), but since nothing
was said on www-validator... -- and keep the topic alive.

That sounds a great idea and I'll make a point of reminding Gerald[0]
whenever an opportunity presents itself[1].




[0] - Gerald Oskoboiny, the Evil Genious[tm] beind the validator. :-)
[1] - As in: "Whenever I badger him for more features". :-)
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 21:15:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT